Technological expert reports

Expert witnesses specialised in judicial and out-of-court proceedings

We turn technological complexity into solid evidence: we preserve evidence, analyse the facts, and deliver objective, verifiable expert reports. We support and advise lawyers, companies, and individuals with rigour and confidentiality. Backed by more than 15 years of experience.

We offer two types of technological expert reports tailored to your needs: for judicial proceedings that require evidence admissible in court, or for extrajudicial situations where you need to clarify facts, negotiate, or make decisions with confidence.

Judicial Expert Reports

Expert reports for legal proceedings: evidence certification, digital document authentication, forensic analysis, and court ratification.

View judicial services

Extrajudicial Expert Reports

Technical reports for negotiation, claims, or mediation: business consulting, IT audits, executive support, and mediation in technological disputes.

View extrajudicial services

When do you need a Technology Expert Witness?

Cybersecurity incidents, unauthorised access, digital fraud, impersonation, data loss or tampering, disputes over software or IT services, or evidence contained in emails, whatsapp, telegram, photos, video, audio, devices, and systems. A technology expert witness report helps preserve and substantiate evidence, explain the facts with sound technical judgement, and deliver an objective, defensible report for court proceedings or prior negotiations.

Expert reports and rebuttal report

Expert reports and rebuttal report

An expert report is a professional document, signed by an expert witness , that analyses facts, examines evidence, and provides technical conclusions in an objective and verifiable way, so they can be understood and assessed in a judicial. A counter-expert report reviews and challenges an existing report, identifying potential errors, omissions, or bias, and providing an alternative, defensible technical view.

Court testimony

Court testimony

Court ratification is when the expert witness appears in court to confirm the expert report and explain it clearly, answering questions from the judge and the parties. It matters because it adds credibility and evidential weight to the report: it helps clarify doubts, defend the methodology and conclusions, and reinforce that the analysis is objective, rigorous, and verifiable.

Certified emails

Certified emails

It is the process of preserving and documenting emails (content, headers, attachments, and metadata) to prove their authenticity, integrity, and traceability. It helps demonstrate what was sent, who sent it, and when, preventing tampering and providing solid technical evidence in judicial or out-of-court proceedings.

Audio recording analysis and authentication

Audio recording analysis and authentication

Examination of recordings to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking for possible tampering (cuts, edits, splices), assessing signal continuity, noise, and recording conditions, and, if needed, reviewing metadata and the chain of custody to support whether the audio is original or has been altered.

Video recording analysis and authentication

Video recording analysis and authentication

Examination of recordings to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking for possible tampering (cuts, edits, splices), assessing image and/or audio continuity, compression, artifacts, and recording conditions, and, if needed, reviewing metadata and the chain of custody to support whether the video is original or has been altered.

Geolocation (GPS) validation

Geolocation (GPS) validation

Examination of geolocation data to determine whether it is consistent and verifiable. This includes reviewing coordinates, timestamps, routes, and logging sources to support its validity and traceability.

Digital timekeeping record verification

Digital timekeeping record verification

Examination of digital time records to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking timestamps, users, modifications, and system traceability to support their validation.

Technical expert assessment in digital unfair competition cases

Technical expert assessment in digital unfair competition cases

Technical analysis of digital evidence to determine whether it is relevant and supportable in competition disputes. This includes reviewing system access, communications, use of information, and activity traces to support facts and attribution.

Detection and substantiation of digital business cloning

Detection and substantiation of digital business cloning

Technical analysis of indicators to determine whether a fraudulent copy of a digital business exists. This includes comparing websites, content, code, digital assets, and deployment traces to support similarity, origin, and responsibility.

Investigation of unlawful data extraction

Investigation of unlawful data extraction

Technical analysis of data extractions to determine whether they occurred outside the authorized environment. This includes reviewing access, transfers, devices, logs, and data volume to support method, scope, and attribution.

Digital document authentication and substantiation

Digital document authentication and substantiation

Technical validation of digital documents to determine whether they are authentic and unaltered. This includes reviewing signatures, metadata, versions, integrity, and traceability to support their legal validity and origin.

When is an out-of-court expert report advisable?

An independent snapshot is obtained of what happened and its impact: what was accessed, what was changed, what data was compromised, and what evidence supports it. Useful in disputes with IT providers, suspected fraud or impersonation, cybersecurity incidents, and disagreements about technology services or projects.

Out-of-court technical report

Out-of-court technical report

A technical report that analyzes facts and evidence to clarify what happened, quantify impacts, identify causes, and provide a solid basis to negotiate, make a claim, or mediate; as well as to deal with insurers and third parties (clients, suppliers, partners, employees, individuals, family members, etc.), make decisions with confidence, and create a record to prevent or defend against potential claims. It is especially useful when there are disputes or risk (cyber incidents, unauthorized access, fraud or impersonation, data loss/tampering, IT disputes, doubts about projects or services) and an objective, supportable view is needed before going to court—or to avoid getting there.

Technology support for senior management

Technology support for senior management

Obtain an independent view of the situation (processes, data, systems, and vendors), assess options and impacts before investing or executing a digital transformation, and reduce risk in sensitive decisions (procurement, projects, integrations, or architecture changes). They are also useful in more delicate scenarios, such as internal investigations, suspected incidents or leaks, disputes with vendors, or concerns about a service’s performance and reliability—providing clear, actionable conclusions to act quickly and confidently.

Technology review of performance and resource usage

Technology review of performance and resource usage

Assessment of the use of digital tools and resources (access, logs, systems) to obtain an objective view of operations and potential deviations.

Software development audit

Software development audit

Technical assessment of quality, architecture, and process (requirements, deliverables, versions) to determine whether the software is compliant and sustainable.

Technical support for lawyers

Technical support for lawyers

Specialist support to understand digital evidence, shape strategy, and translate technical aspects into useful, defensible arguments.

Technical review of IT contracts

Technical review of IT contracts

Critical review of technology clauses (SLAs, security, data, intellectual property, etc.) to identify risks, ambiguities, and gaps.

Preservation and custody of digital evidence

Preservation and custody of digital evidence

Forensic-minded collection and retention of evidence to ensure integrity, traceability, and usefulness for protection, negotiations, or claims.

Technology compliance assessment

Technology compliance assessment

Review of compliance in technology matters (security, data, controls, procedures) to identify gaps and corrective measures.

Preventive digital security training

Preventive digital security training

Practical sessions to reduce risk for companies and organizations: safe habits, phishing, passwords, devices, data, and incident response.

Digital identity impersonation reports

Digital identity impersonation reports

Technical substantiation of impersonation indicators (access, emails, profiles, activity traces) to document the case and enable next steps.

Technical mediation between developer and client

Technical mediation between developer and client

Neutral intervention to unblock conflicts in digital projects, aligning requirements, deliverables, and responsibilities with technical judgment.

Preguntes Freqüents sobre Pericials Tecnològics

It is a technical report prepared by a qualified IT expert that analyzes digital evidence (computers, emails, data, etc.) with legal validity to be presented in court.

When there are conflicts or situations involving technology, such as unauthorized access, digital fraud, data manipulation, labor disputes with digital evidence, or any case requiring technological evidence.

The cost varies depending on the complexity of the case, the volume of data, and the time required. It can range from hundreds to thousands of euros.

Yes, as long as it is prepared by a qualified expert and follows proper chain of custody procedures and forensic methodology.

It depends on the complexity of the case, but it can range from a few days to several weeks.

A judicial report is submitted within a legal proceeding, while an extrajudicial one is carried out outside the court, often for negotiation or preparation of legal action.

Yes, it can be submitted as evidence, although it may require the expert to ratify it before the judge.

Through forensic techniques that ensure its authenticity, integrity, and traceability, such as header and server analysis.

An immediate forensic analysis should be conducted to detect access, preserve evidence, and determine the scope of the incident.

Yes, many experts offer urgent services to meet judicial deadlines or immediate needs.

Yes, the expert translates technical concepts into language that is understandable for lawyers and judges.

Yes, forensic analysis can identify edits, alterations, or manipulations.

By analyzing evidence such as information theft, misuse of data, or fraudulent digital activities.

Yes, all information is handled with strict confidentiality and in accordance with data protection regulations.

Yes, training programs can be provided to prevent risks and improve the company's digital security.