Judicial Expert Reports
Expert reports for legal proceedings: evidence certification, digital document authentication, forensic analysis, and court ratification.
View judicial servicesExpert witnesses specialised in judicial and out-of-court proceedings
We turn technological complexity into solid evidence: we preserve evidence, analyse the facts, and deliver objective, verifiable expert reports. We support and advise lawyers, companies, and individuals with rigour and confidentiality. Backed by more than 15 years of experience.
We offer two types of technological expert reports tailored to your needs: for judicial proceedings that require evidence admissible in court, or for extrajudicial situations where you need to clarify facts, negotiate, or make decisions with confidence.
Expert reports for legal proceedings: evidence certification, digital document authentication, forensic analysis, and court ratification.
View judicial servicesTechnical reports for negotiation, claims, or mediation: business consulting, IT audits, executive support, and mediation in technological disputes.
View extrajudicial services
Cybersecurity incidents, unauthorised access, digital fraud, impersonation, data loss or tampering, disputes over software or IT services, or evidence contained in emails, whatsapp, telegram, photos, video, audio, devices, and systems. A technology expert witness report helps preserve and substantiate evidence, explain the facts with sound technical judgement, and deliver an objective, defensible report for court proceedings or prior negotiations.
An expert report is a professional document, signed by an expert witness , that analyses facts, examines evidence, and provides technical conclusions in an objective and verifiable way, so they can be understood and assessed in a judicial. A counter-expert report reviews and challenges an existing report, identifying potential errors, omissions, or bias, and providing an alternative, defensible technical view.
Court ratification is when the expert witness appears in court to confirm the expert report and explain it clearly, answering questions from the judge and the parties. It matters because it adds credibility and evidential weight to the report: it helps clarify doubts, defend the methodology and conclusions, and reinforce that the analysis is objective, rigorous, and verifiable.
It is the process of preserving and documenting emails (content, headers, attachments, and metadata) to prove their authenticity, integrity, and traceability. It helps demonstrate what was sent, who sent it, and when, preventing tampering and providing solid technical evidence in judicial or out-of-court proceedings.
Examination of recordings to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking for possible tampering (cuts, edits, splices), assessing signal continuity, noise, and recording conditions, and, if needed, reviewing metadata and the chain of custody to support whether the audio is original or has been altered.
Examination of recordings to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking for possible tampering (cuts, edits, splices), assessing image and/or audio continuity, compression, artifacts, and recording conditions, and, if needed, reviewing metadata and the chain of custody to support whether the video is original or has been altered.
Examination of geolocation data to determine whether it is consistent and verifiable. This includes reviewing coordinates, timestamps, routes, and logging sources to support its validity and traceability.
Examination of digital time records to determine whether they are intact and reliable. This includes checking timestamps, users, modifications, and system traceability to support their validation.
Technical analysis of digital evidence to determine whether it is relevant and supportable in competition disputes. This includes reviewing system access, communications, use of information, and activity traces to support facts and attribution.
Technical analysis of indicators to determine whether a fraudulent copy of a digital business exists. This includes comparing websites, content, code, digital assets, and deployment traces to support similarity, origin, and responsibility.
Technical analysis of data extractions to determine whether they occurred outside the authorized environment. This includes reviewing access, transfers, devices, logs, and data volume to support method, scope, and attribution.
Technical validation of digital documents to determine whether they are authentic and unaltered. This includes reviewing signatures, metadata, versions, integrity, and traceability to support their legal validity and origin.
An independent snapshot is obtained of what happened and its impact: what was accessed, what was changed, what data was compromised, and what evidence supports it. Useful in disputes with IT providers, suspected fraud or impersonation, cybersecurity incidents, and disagreements about technology services or projects.
A technical report that analyzes facts and evidence to clarify what happened, quantify impacts, identify causes, and provide a solid basis to negotiate, make a claim, or mediate; as well as to deal with insurers and third parties (clients, suppliers, partners, employees, individuals, family members, etc.), make decisions with confidence, and create a record to prevent or defend against potential claims. It is especially useful when there are disputes or risk (cyber incidents, unauthorized access, fraud or impersonation, data loss/tampering, IT disputes, doubts about projects or services) and an objective, supportable view is needed before going to court—or to avoid getting there.
Obtain an independent view of the situation (processes, data, systems, and vendors), assess options and impacts before investing or executing a digital transformation, and reduce risk in sensitive decisions (procurement, projects, integrations, or architecture changes). They are also useful in more delicate scenarios, such as internal investigations, suspected incidents or leaks, disputes with vendors, or concerns about a service’s performance and reliability—providing clear, actionable conclusions to act quickly and confidently.
Assessment of the use of digital tools and resources (access, logs, systems) to obtain an objective view of operations and potential deviations.
Technical assessment of quality, architecture, and process (requirements, deliverables, versions) to determine whether the software is compliant and sustainable.
Specialist support to understand digital evidence, shape strategy, and translate technical aspects into useful, defensible arguments.
Critical review of technology clauses (SLAs, security, data, intellectual property, etc.) to identify risks, ambiguities, and gaps.
Forensic-minded collection and retention of evidence to ensure integrity, traceability, and usefulness for protection, negotiations, or claims.
Review of compliance in technology matters (security, data, controls, procedures) to identify gaps and corrective measures.
Practical sessions to reduce risk for companies and organizations: safe habits, phishing, passwords, devices, data, and incident response.
Technical substantiation of impersonation indicators (access, emails, profiles, activity traces) to document the case and enable next steps.
Neutral intervention to unblock conflicts in digital projects, aligning requirements, deliverables, and responsibilities with technical judgment.